I must say I have a hard time understanding this decision.
If it's a reasonable choice for the GNOME-based Ubuntu-variant to include GParted then I fail to see why including KDE Partition Manager in the KDE based variant "can do harm too easily".
I also fail to see why a GNOME user would need a partitioning tool on the install medium, but a KDE user would not. Are GNOME users in general so much smarter and computer-savvy then us KDE users?
I find it deplorable that you refer KDE users to a GNOME-based recovery CD.
I must say I have a hard time understanding this decision.
If it's a reasonable choice for the GNOME-based Ubuntu-variant to include GParted then I fail to see why including KDE Partition Manager in the KDE based variant "can do harm too easily".
I also fail to see why a GNOME user would need a partitioning tool on the install medium, but a KDE user would not. Are GNOME users in general so much smarter and computer-savvy then us KDE users?
I find it deplorable that you refer KDE users to a GNOME-based recovery CD.
(Disclaimer: I'm the KDE Partition Manager dev.)