Comment 5 for bug 613926

On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 03:25:05 -0000, Fabrice Coutadeur wrote:

> Hi,

Hello,

> All required packages has been synced.

Thank you!

> Could you please check if the sync is still relevant, and if so, document the
> FFe (basically, checking that package builds, installs and runs fine,
> documenting the tests you've done)?

Debian/unstable now has 0.0.svn3514-1. This is the additional changelog entry
from the original report:

josm (0.0.svn3514-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream snapshot
  * debian/patches/* refreshed to cleanly apply to the new code
  * debian/patches/60-port_oauth_1.2.patch removed, merged upstream
  * debian/control:
    - Build-Depends on default-jdk bumped to >= 1.6
    - Standards-Version bumped to 3.9.1, no changes needed
    - drop alternative dependency on sun-java5-jre: Java 5 is no more
      supported by upstream

 -- David Paleino <email address hidden> Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:58:00 +0200

However, I couldn't succesfully build this version on maverick. The reason is a
change I made in debian/control:

- default-jdk,
+ default-jdk (>= 1:1.6),

It fails on Maverick because it has default-jdk 1.6, while Debian has 1:1.6.

I could fix this in a -2 (maybe using (>= 1:1.6) | (>= 1.6), or maybe some
more solid hack using dpkg-vendor), and I also have another change [0] pending
for -2 -- would it be acceptable to FFe this new version (which I should still
upload to sid)?

Otherwise, the original version this sync/FFe was for (3376-1), is still
available in Debian/testing -- it should be possible to sync it from there.
(I'd prefer the newer version though).

What would you suggest?

Thank you,
David

[0]:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-grass/josm.git;a=commitdiff;h=e3b751a10db983a9d05cf744bdba9e4368b97617

--
 . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal
   `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174