On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 16:56 +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> Hello,
> Thanks Peter for sending the patch to Debian, I am currently working
> on merging the Ubuntu changes into Debian, but I see that according to
> the bug report on Launchpad, the problem cannot be reproduced by
> Fabrice on Lucid, does that mean that the patch of Peter is not needed
> or what ?
It is an upstream patch, not my own.
The problem can only be reproduced on systems where the LOCALE
(LC_NUMERIC) in use forces "," as the decimal point specifier.
I'm not 100% sure it is the "," vs. "." issue which is the problem, as
the original reporter didn't report the LC_NUMERIC of his system yet.
In any case, the reporter stated that the patch fixed the issue for
them, and was included upstream to fix the same problem reported
elsewhere.
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 16:56 +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> Hello,
> Thanks Peter for sending the patch to Debian, I am currently working
> on merging the Ubuntu changes into Debian, but I see that according to
> the bug report on Launchpad, the problem cannot be reproduced by
> Fabrice on Lucid, does that mean that the patch of Peter is not needed
> or what ?
It is an upstream patch, not my own.
The problem can only be reproduced on systems where the LOCALE
(LC_NUMERIC) in use forces "," as the decimal point specifier.
I'm not 100% sure it is the "," vs. "." issue which is the problem, as
the original reporter didn't report the LC_NUMERIC of his system yet.
In any case, the reporter stated that the patch fixed the issue for
them, and was included upstream to fix the same problem reported
elsewhere.