On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 07:15:52PM -0000, John Toliver wrote:
> fusesmb is a fairly decent work around from the home user perspective. In
> light of the fact that upstream isn't addressing the fix or at least it
> isn't available yet, does anyone know of a way to ask Canonical to downgrade
> to the version of samba that worked properly in Gutsy? Would it be THAT
> much of a dependency problem?
This is not a Samba bug, it's a gvfs bug. There is no version of gvfs
available that handles this case correctly, and the previous VFS layer for
GNOME, gnome-vfs, is also not an option because it's abandoned and lacks
integration with the current releases of GNOME.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
<email address hidden> <email address hidden>
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 07:15:52PM -0000, John Toliver wrote:
> fusesmb is a fairly decent work around from the home user perspective. In
> light of the fact that upstream isn't addressing the fix or at least it
> isn't available yet, does anyone know of a way to ask Canonical to downgrade
> to the version of samba that worked properly in Gutsy? Would it be THAT
> much of a dependency problem?
This is not a Samba bug, it's a gvfs bug. There is no version of gvfs
available that handles this case correctly, and the previous VFS layer for
GNOME, gnome-vfs, is also not an option because it's abandoned and lacks
integration with the current releases of GNOME.
-- www.debian. org/
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://
<email address hidden> <email address hidden>