during RTL pass: reload
/root/qemu-5.0/fpu/softfloat.c: In function ‘soft_f64_muladd’:
/root/qemu-5.0/fpu/softfloat.c:1535:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
1535 | }
| ^
...
0x532aeb crash_signal
../../src/gcc/toplev.c:328
0x41ccd7 add_regs_to_insn_regno_info
../../src/gcc/lra.c:1515
0x41cdd9 add_regs_to_insn_regno_info
../../src/gcc/lra.c:1537
0x41cdd9 add_regs_to_insn_regno_info
../../src/gcc/lra.c:1537
0x41de9f lra_update_insn_regno_info(rtx_insn*)
../../src/gcc/lra.c:1630
0x42be95 lra_constraints(bool)
../../src/gcc/lra-constraints.c:4975
0x41f093 lra(_IO_FILE*)
../../src/gcc/lra.c:2443
0x3f0405 do_reload
../../src/gcc/ira.c:5527
0x3f0405 execute
../../src/gcc/ira.c:5713
Please submit a full bug report,
...
The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem.
So we surely fixed the "TYPE_CANONICAL" issue in the checker builds.
But is this one that I hit now the same original issue we had before or a different one?
Can you derive that from the traceback?
Failed on the second run with:
during RTL pass: reload 5.0/fpu/ softfloat. c: In function ‘soft_f64_muladd’: 5.0/fpu/ softfloat. c:1535: 1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault src/gcc/ toplev. c:328 to_insn_ regno_info src/gcc/ lra.c:1515 to_insn_ regno_info src/gcc/ lra.c:1537 to_insn_ regno_info src/gcc/ lra.c:1537 insn_regno_ info(rtx_ insn*) src/gcc/ lra.c:1630 (bool) src/gcc/ lra-constraints .c:4975 src/gcc/ lra.c:2443 src/gcc/ ira.c:5527 src/gcc/ ira.c:5713
/root/qemu-
/root/qemu-
1535 | }
| ^
...
0x532aeb crash_signal
../../
0x41ccd7 add_regs_
../../
0x41cdd9 add_regs_
../../
0x41cdd9 add_regs_
../../
0x41de9f lra_update_
../../
0x42be95 lra_constraints
../../
0x41f093 lra(_IO_FILE*)
../../
0x3f0405 do_reload
../../
0x3f0405 execute
../../
Please submit a full bug report,
...
The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem.
So we surely fixed the "TYPE_CANONICAL" issue in the checker builds.
But is this one that I hit now the same original issue we had before or a different one?
Can you derive that from the traceback?