Comment 109 for bug 1890435

Revision history for this message
Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) wrote :

As mentioned before - I didn't trust this result.
And with "likeliness" of this being so low we all know that results are unreliable.
Due to that now r10-6822 is

r10-6822 - bad 2 of 67

The signature was the same "add_regs_to_insn_regno_info (lra)" as before on (again) different places tcg/tcg.c:2180 and fpu/softfloat.c:7133.

What to do from here ...
We could bisect again starting with r10-6822 and 20190425 and use at least like 100 runs each.
But that would be a last resort as I'm on ~1run/h which means ~4 days each step.

I have a few "maybe we are lucky" things to try first:
- 10.2.1-1 in hirsute
- trunk gcc-r11-5879.tar.xz
- Doing a run with -O1