Comment 6 for bug 35528

Revision history for this message
Dennis Kaarsemaker (dennis) wrote : Re: [Bug 35528] Re: security hole in 2.0.2/2.0.3

> So what I should be doing, if I understand the two channels correctly,
> and if the bug is severe enough, is to add a dapper-security task to
> this bug. Is that correct?

Actually, I would not consider this bug 'fix released' without a fix in
all supported distros. But since the package is in universe, Barry is
free to ignore those. Barry: was the fix an easy one? If so, I can
prepare hoary/breezy/dapper updates if applicable.