Cody A.W. Somerville wrote:
> ** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided
> => High
>
Never mind i see wher eit says from Hardy. but Scott pushed a new
flash to downgrade as flash+64 bit seem to have most issues due to
libflashsupport. Also most sites may not have support for flash 10 yet.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Cody A.W. Somerville wrote:
> ** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided
> => High
>
Never mind i see wher eit says from Hardy. but Scott pushed a new
flash to downgrade as flash+64 bit seem to have most issues due to
libflashsupport. Also most sites may not have support for flash 10 yet.
- --
Sincerely Yours,
John Vivirito
https:/ /launchpad. net/~gnomefreak /wiki.ubuntu. com/JohnVivirit o enigmail. mozdev. org
https:/
Linux User# 414246
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iD8DBQFIeyumqig 4QTwcPCoRAo2+ AJ4zcZZsXTpYEuO IJTQDTV7WeVuTbA CbB1BR I+h7LB0E=
+KyvMBTza8wP0yN
=NKhl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----