Comment 50 for bug 235135

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Daniel T Chen wrote:
> The current version of intrepid's source packages for flashplugin-
> nonfree and libflashsupport should be backported to hardy (and possibly
> gutsy).
>
> It is not entirely clear how alsa-lib and alsa-plugins should be
> handled. Based on testing, the current version of intrepid's source
> packages for alsa-lib and alsa-plugins also need to be backported. fx5
> asserts that hardy's libasound2-plugins (alsa-plugins) works fine for
> him, but it's not entirely clear whether he's using the older (and
> reverted) version of libasound2 (alsa-lib, from hardy-proposed).
>
> I will attempt to commit a minimal set of diffs for hardy's alsa-lib.
>
Ok i think its safe to say we can backport libflashsupport and flash10
and Damiel will worry about pulse audio.
I have Hardy ready for backports it builds and runs with libflashsupport .
As for Gutsy it didnt ship with libflashsupport IIRC so it will be a new
package as a backport is this ok by backporter standards if you let me
know ill go ahead and build the packages for Gutsy and add them to PPA.
Well ill do it anyway since its a good diea to not ship flash without
libflashsupport at this time since PA isnt really updated in Gutsy but
let me know. Ill mark Hardy backports as triaged to get ball rolling.

- --
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIcqDJqig4QTwcPCoRAgEAAJsEoQUz98Qa3ZxufbPUOhittCconwCfXDeu
vhTvi5Q94hamc2heCqHbHys=
=o5C7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----