It indicates the static html 'eula' that Fedora 9 uses is only temporary, and Mozilla is insisting on a complete EULA for Fedora 10.
If that article clearly and accurately represents the interaction between Mozilla and the Fedora board, then *I* think the only solution here to either start using Iceweasel or convince Mozilla to reverse their position (which doesn't sound very hopeful).
I hope everyone who is sincere about resolving this issue (and not just MAKING NOISE) reviews that article.
As pointed out earlier in this thread, I found http:// spot.livejourna l.com/299409. html to be very informative.
It indicates the static html 'eula' that Fedora 9 uses is only temporary, and Mozilla is insisting on a complete EULA for Fedora 10.
If that article clearly and accurately represents the interaction between Mozilla and the Fedora board, then *I* think the only solution here to either start using Iceweasel or convince Mozilla to reverse their position (which doesn't sound very hopeful).
I hope everyone who is sincere about resolving this issue (and not just MAKING NOISE) reviews that article.