Comment 345 for bug 269656

I really agree with Raphael Bosshard.

I think it is unacceptable an EULA in a Free Software system as Ubuntu, and
I think a package in main repository shouldn't have any EULA to accept.

I am supporter of using Iceweasel in place of Firefox, to avoid these
problems now and in the future, Iceweasel is Firefox with other name, it is
compatible with Firefox plugins and extensions, so i don't see problems with
this. And becouse Iceweasel already exists, i do not see the reason for make
another fork of Firefox by name problems as like as abrowser.

Someone asked: Do you prefer Ice--- what? or the famous FIREFOX?

My answer is: Yes, I prefer Iceweasel than Firefox.

See also: http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/13201/

2008/9/16 Raphael Bosshard <email address hidden>

> Let's switch to Iceweasle. From a technical standpoint Iceweasle and
> Firefox are identical, we can keep the relevant parts of the UA string
> and there won't be any problems.
>
> Mozilla's trademark strategy has already caused trouble in the past.
> Let's try to avoid that an the future. By using Iceweasle, Mozilla's
> brands won't be a problem anymore.
>
> Even if some people don't consider EULAs a problem; I do. There is no
> need for EULAs for Free Software products.
>
> --
> AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269656
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>