2008/9/15 Andrew <email address hidden>:
> using Firefox[3]. So I suspect that Google wishing to protect themselves
> from allegations of spying on Firefox users have insisted on the privacy
> policy being prominent and, agreed by Firefox users. However, no one who
> knows about it can talk about it, because of non disclosures agreements.
> I am not suggesting that there is anything sinister going on, just
> cautious lawyers keeping everyone quiet.
Which was why I proposed to change the EULA to a dialog that says
something like:
"Do you wish to enable phishing protection? This will require sending
communication to google but no private information will be sent unless
you tag a suspected site."
[Enable] [Disable phishing protection]
That way it's not a EULA, the user is informed, and users who don't
want to can disable phishing protection and still use firefox.
2008/9/15 Andrew <email address hidden>:
> using Firefox[3]. So I suspect that Google wishing to protect themselves
> from allegations of spying on Firefox users have insisted on the privacy
> policy being prominent and, agreed by Firefox users. However, no one who
> knows about it can talk about it, because of non disclosures agreements.
> I am not suggesting that there is anything sinister going on, just
> cautious lawyers keeping everyone quiet.
Which was why I proposed to change the EULA to a dialog that says
something like:
"Do you wish to enable phishing protection? This will require sending
communication to google but no private information will be sent unless
you tag a suspected site."
[Enable] [Disable phishing protection]
That way it's not a EULA, the user is informed, and users who don't
want to can disable phishing protection and still use firefox.