Ubuntu
firefox-3.0 package

  1. Bug #269656
  2. Comment #192

Comment 192 for bug 269656

Revision history for this message
Nick Rhodes (ngrhodes) wrote :

This is not an issue about how Ubuntu should redistribute Firefox (in respect to having a completely free licence), but about how the user agrees to using Firefox.

Is there even any new issue of free-ness caused by the inclusion of this EULA ?

Is there any policy about how they should be displayed/formatted - is there any software with EULA in supported repositories that sets presidence ?

As the EULA is a legal document, Canonical supports and distributes Ubuntu internationally, are they aware if the EULA is locally acceptable (legal, enforceable etc) and what can be done if problems are found with the EULA ?

How will Canonical support bugs/issues with EULA in any software ?

Cheers, Nick

PS - When will can expect an EULA for Thunderbird ;) ?