> In summary: I'd hate to see firefox not be the default, but an EULA
> is unacceptable.
>
Could I just remind people that there is no practical difference
between a branded and unbranded "firefox". All that happens is that it
has different icons and a different name.
If you went through all the code in <insert program here> and changed
it's name it would still work the same and look almost the same.
> In summary: I'd hate to see firefox not be the default, but an EULA
> is unacceptable.
>
Could I just remind people that there is no practical difference
between a branded and unbranded "firefox". All that happens is that it
has different icons and a different name.
If you went through all the code in <insert program here> and changed
it's name it would still work the same and look almost the same.
solar.george