Fortunately I don't have to make the decision, but some of you will. In fact, all options (other than Mozilla removing that restriction) have flaws. So, who will decide and when will a decision be made?
Personally, I don't like the idea of presenting a EULA to any of our users in the default installation.
So why don't we switch to "abrowser" (1) in the default install and add "firefox-3.0-branding" to ubuntu-restricted-extras?
(1) BTW: I'd love to see it called "Web Browser" instead of "A Web Browser" in the Gnome menu and I think the "Mozilla Firefox" text at the title bar should be changed also.
Fortunately I don't have to make the decision, but some of you will. In fact, all options (other than Mozilla removing that restriction) have flaws. So, who will decide and when will a decision be made?
Personally, I don't like the idea of presenting a EULA to any of our users in the default installation. 3.0-branding" to ubuntu- restricted- extras?
So why don't we switch to "abrowser" (1) in the default install and add "firefox-
(1) BTW: I'd love to see it called "Web Browser" instead of "A Web Browser" in the Gnome menu and I think the "Mozilla Firefox" text at the title bar should be changed also.