Alexander Sack [2009-07-09 14:27 -0000]:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 01:22:11PM -0000, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > verification-done tag removed for the hardy update. Does this really
> > need to be fixed in hardy as well? For firefox 3.5 backports?
>
> no. the verification is done.
Misunderstanding? The verification was done for jaunty, and I copied
jaunty-proposed to jaunty-updates. But there is no hardy-proposed
version for libxcb; since the task is still open, I assumed that you
want to fix it there as well. But we need to test the hardy update
separately.
> the other problem is a slightly different bug and should be tracked
> differently imo.
Alexander Sack [2009-07-09 14:27 -0000]:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 01:22:11PM -0000, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > verification-done tag removed for the hardy update. Does this really
> > need to be fixed in hardy as well? For firefox 3.5 backports?
>
> no. the verification is done.
Misunderstanding? The verification was done for jaunty, and I copied
jaunty-proposed to jaunty-updates. But there is no hardy-proposed
version for libxcb; since the task is still open, I assumed that you
want to fix it there as well. But we need to test the hardy update
separately.
> the other problem is a slightly different bug and should be tracked
> differently imo.
Yes, I agree.