We're shipping this patch now. Please, unless there is a problem with
it (explicitly *not* the operational behaviour --- that is intentional), try to
keep discussion to the upstream bug now.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 05:13:23PM -0000, Pascal de Bruijn wrote:
>Since XDG can rename paths, and F-Spot stores absolute paths, this is
>actually a pretty poor idea... Doing this right, requires pretty
>invasive work in F-Spot.
Yes, this has been discussed upstream. This behaviour happens even
without our patch, so there is no regression over upstream behaviour
by shipping it.
>The current patch (tested with 0.6.1.5) even seems to put photo's in
>~/Pictures/Photos/<year>/... instead of ~/Pictures/<year>/... when no
>location has been explicitly set.
Hiya,
We're shipping this patch now. Please, unless there is a problem with
it (explicitly *not* the operational behaviour --- that is intentional), try to
keep discussion to the upstream bug now.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 05:13:23PM -0000, Pascal de Bruijn wrote:
>Since XDG can rename paths, and F-Spot stores absolute paths, this is
>actually a pretty poor idea... Doing this right, requires pretty
>invasive work in F-Spot.
Yes, this has been discussed upstream. This behaviour happens even
without our patch, so there is no regression over upstream behaviour
by shipping it.
>The current patch (tested with 0.6.1.5) even seems to put photo's in Photos/ <year>/ ... instead of ~/Pictures/ <year>/ ... when no
>~/Pictures/
>location has been explicitly set.
That's right. We just change the base directory.
Regards,
Iain