On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 21:02 +0000, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> Hmm, from what I read from Chris, this should be fix-released for Lucid,
> right?
>
> Again, Robert, can you take a gander at Lucid?
If someone can run up a lucid instance over the net I can confirm that
ssl works (or not).
What would be great though is to do it on port 443; which is what
firewalls etc *expect* ssl to be on. Many firewalls block unknown ports,
and look for encrypted data to block etc. (Particularly in corporates,
which is the target for UEC :)).
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 21:02 +0000, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> Hmm, from what I read from Chris, this should be fix-released for Lucid,
> right?
>
> Again, Robert, can you take a gander at Lucid?
If someone can run up a lucid instance over the net I can confirm that
ssl works (or not).
What would be great though is to do it on port 443; which is what
firewalls etc *expect* ssl to be on. Many firewalls block unknown ports,
and look for encrypted data to block etc. (Particularly in corporates,
which is the target for UEC :)).
-Rob