Comment 2 for bug 190905

I pinged the support guys about whether they are ok with supporting dnsmasq as well. Personally I don't like it much because it duplicates functionality with dhcp3-server (which has been our supported DHCP server forever), and especially for an LTS we invested a lot of work to reduce packages with duplicate functionality, not increase it.

I understand, though, that it is nontrivial to make kvm work with dhcp3-server, so I consider it.