On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Cristian Greco wrote:
> Who is the actual maintainer for Ubuntu? Why don't you wait for sync
> with Debian instead of forking packaging work?
That's what I said few posts before, and that's the way we should do this.
> I'm really interested in cooperating with the actual maintainer.
We don't have an actual maintainer for the package, and everyone can
work on it (provide new upstream versions, preparing syncs/merges from
Debian, preparing patches). But it is possible that one person is
doing the most of the work on some package. You can check the
changelog [1]. It seems that in past Deluge has been directly synced
from Debian with no changes to the packaging. If no one files a sync
request I'll do it myself later. Actually, this bug report can be just
modified so it states that we should sync 1.1.2 from Debian.
Hello Cristian,
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Cristian Greco wrote:
> Who is the actual maintainer for Ubuntu? Why don't you wait for sync
> with Debian instead of forking packaging work?
That's what I said few posts before, and that's the way we should do this.
> I'm really interested in cooperating with the actual maintainer.
We don't have an actual maintainer for the package, and everyone can
work on it (provide new upstream versions, preparing syncs/merges from
Debian, preparing patches). But it is possible that one person is
doing the most of the work on some package. You can check the
changelog [1]. It seems that in past Deluge has been directly synced
from Debian with no changes to the packaging. If no one files a sync
request I'll do it myself later. Actually, this bug report can be just
modified so it states that we should sync 1.1.2 from Debian.
[1] <http:// changelogs. ubuntu. com/changelogs/ pool/universe/ d/deluge/ deluge_ 1.0.7.dfsg- 3/changelog>
--
Best regards,
Saša Bodiroža