On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 06:59 +0000, Ted Gould wrote:
> No, I marked it invalid because it doesn't make sense that there is
> something gnome-screensaver could do would crash compiz. Even if there
> was, that's a bug with compiz not gnome-screensaver. They're at the
> wrong places in the stack to affect each other in that way. I'm not
> saying the bug is invalid, I'm saying that assigning it to
> gnome-screensaver is invalid and that is all that I changed. It might
> be an X bug, but it seems most likely to be a compiz bug to me.
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 06:59 +0000, Ted Gould wrote:
> No, I marked it invalid because it doesn't make sense that there is
> something gnome-screensaver could do would crash compiz. Even if there
> was, that's a bug with compiz not gnome-screensaver. They're at the
> wrong places in the stack to affect each other in that way. I'm not
> saying the bug is invalid, I'm saying that assigning it to
> gnome-screensaver is invalid and that is all that I changed. It might
> be an X bug, but it seems most likely to be a compiz bug to me.
Ted: Okay, thanks for the clarification!