On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 23:29 +0000, edschofield wrote:
> Ted, have you really marked a segfault bug with 22 duplicates as
> "invalid" because you personally have not experienced it on your
> particular hardware?
No, I marked it invalid because it doesn't make sense that there is
something gnome-screensaver could do would crash compiz. Even if there
was, that's a bug with compiz not gnome-screensaver. They're at the
wrong places in the stack to affect each other in that way. I'm not
saying the bug is invalid, I'm saying that assigning it to
gnome-screensaver is invalid and that is all that I changed. It might
be an X bug, but it seems most likely to be a compiz bug to me.
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 23:29 +0000, edschofield wrote:
> Ted, have you really marked a segfault bug with 22 duplicates as
> "invalid" because you personally have not experienced it on your
> particular hardware?
No, I marked it invalid because it doesn't make sense that there is
something gnome-screensaver could do would crash compiz. Even if there
was, that's a bug with compiz not gnome-screensaver. They're at the
wrong places in the stack to affect each other in that way. I'm not
saying the bug is invalid, I'm saying that assigning it to
gnome-screensaver is invalid and that is all that I changed. It might
be an X bug, but it seems most likely to be a compiz bug to me.