Comment 35 for bug 190791

I'm more-or-less back online, I will probably start redesigning the
packages in a month or so. I must admit that I don't use this package
and I simply did it out of packaging interest. :)

But I would like someone to answer the following:
1. What purpose cinepaint serves that makes it unique?
2. Are you 100% sure that cinepaint is the only tool available for
what makes it unique?
I'm asking because I have noticed several HDR imaging tools, like:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/qtpfsgui
Also noticed Krita for KDE: http://krita.org/features

Mantas Kriaučiūnas:
> It seems you don't need to maintain libelektra packages -Christophe
> Mehay already packaged libelektra, see https://launchpad.net/~goldy-
> goldenfish/+archive/ppa , please use these packages instead repackaging
> libelekra by yourself.

I suppose I could merge the package names in debian/control with my
package, since I've done more "work" to install files in the right
directories, defined the copyright and removed the unnecessary (not
sure if they are unnecessary) *_static files.

Milan Knizek:
> Thanks for the PPA. Note that oyranos-icc conflicts with "icc-profiles"
> package.

Milan, should I not create the package oyranos-icc? Are all icc
profiles included in icc-profiles ?