Comment 3 for bug 301540

Revision history for this message
Daniel Holbach (dholbach) wrote :

Bhavani: Kees suggested the following:
-Replaces: selinux
-Conflicts: selinux
+Replaces: selinux (<= 2003040709-11)
+Conflicts: selinux (<= 2003040709-11)

What in Debian happened was:
-Replaces: selinux
-Conflicts: selinux

Effectively this means for Ubuntu right now:
-Replaces: selinux (<= 2003040709-11)
-Conflicts: selinux (<= 2003040709-11)

Why would it be OK for Ubuntu to drop the change? I don't understand what "Dependency normalisation" means here.