Bhavani: Kees suggested the following: -Replaces: selinux -Conflicts: selinux +Replaces: selinux (<= 2003040709-11) +Conflicts: selinux (<= 2003040709-11)
What in Debian happened was: -Replaces: selinux -Conflicts: selinux
Effectively this means for Ubuntu right now: -Replaces: selinux (<= 2003040709-11) -Conflicts: selinux (<= 2003040709-11)
Why would it be OK for Ubuntu to drop the change? I don't understand what "Dependency normalisation" means here.
Bhavani: Kees suggested the following:
-Replaces: selinux
-Conflicts: selinux
+Replaces: selinux (<= 2003040709-11)
+Conflicts: selinux (<= 2003040709-11)
What in Debian happened was:
-Replaces: selinux
-Conflicts: selinux
Effectively this means for Ubuntu right now:
-Replaces: selinux (<= 2003040709-11)
-Conflicts: selinux (<= 2003040709-11)
Why would it be OK for Ubuntu to drop the change? I don't understand what "Dependency normalisation" means here.