Log in / Register
Ubuntu
babl package
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #279565
Comment #1
Comment 1 for bug 279565
Revision history for this message
Loïc Minier (lool)
wrote
on 2008-10-07
:
#1
libbabl-0.0-0-dev is an awful name; how come it's not at least libbabl-0.0-dev?
libbabl-0.0-0-dev is an awful name; how come it's not at least libbabl-0.0-dev?
libbabl-0.0-0-dev is an awful name; how come it's not at least libbabl-0.0-dev?