Main Inclusion Request: babl

Bug #279565 reported by Didier Roche-Tolomelli
8
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
babl (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Revision history for this message
Loïc Minier (lool) wrote :

libbabl-0.0-0-dev is an awful name; how come it's not at least libbabl-0.0-dev?

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

I agree that 0.0-0 is a bad package name since it is apparently not the soname of the library. But heck, it made debian NEW, and I don't think we should divert just for this.

Promoted.

Changed in babl:
status: New → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.