Comment 9 for bug 159338
Revision history for this message
| Reinhard Tartler (siretart) wrote Re: [Bug 159338] Re: Re: Heads-up: small xine-lib transition in hardy | #9 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
Emmet Hikory <email address hidden> writes:
>>From a quick look at pyxine, the correct dependencies of python-pyxine
> are not clear, given that one could write either an X or console
> binding. The only reverse dependency of python-pyxine is lsongs. I see
> two options, and encourage someone more familar with python or xine to
> select one (or suggest something preferable)
>
> A) Add libxine1-x | libxine1-console | libxine1 (<< 1.1.8-2) to pyxine-xine dependencies
> B) Add libxine1-x to lsongs dependencies & nothing to pyxine-xine
My current guess is that we should go with option B. I've CC'ed the
debian pyxine maintainer in this email.
Jaldhar, what are your plans regarding the pyxine package in Debian?
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4