Comment 7 for bug 208405

Revision history for this message
Christian Reis (kiko) wrote : Re: [Bug 208405] Re: [needs-packaging] iscan

I can test with the Perfection v350 -- but Canonical itself doesn't own
any scanners and can only commit to testing if Avasys arranges some
scanners for us to test with. The deadline for Jaunty is too soon; this
isn't going to make it. However, I'd like to see this problem fixed in
Jaunty+1.

The fundamental thing to ask Avasys is whether or not they can produce a
single release of iscan that supports all the proprietary drivers they
offer. I'd like to understand the rationale for the weirdness there --
is it because they really can't recompile or forward-port the drivers,
or is it just because they haven't gotten around to doing it?