Comment 2 for bug 105428

On April 14, 2005 12:39 am, Michael Koch wrote:

Aww. I screwed up again. I must have been too tired and/or enthusiastic when
I submitted this.

> > * Package name : codeblocks
> > Version : x.y.z

Version: 1.0-beta6

> No version?
>
> > Upstream Author : Name <email address hidden>

Yiannis Mandravellos (<email address hidden>)

> No upstream author?
>
> > * URL : http://www.example.org/
>
> No homepage?

http://www.codeblocks.net & http://www.sf.net/projects/codeblocks

>
> > * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)

> No license?

GPL

>
> > Description : Code::Blocks is a free C/C++ IDE built.
> >

This is the official description copied from the site:

> > Code::Blocks is a free C/C++ IDE built specifically to meet the most
> > demanding needs of its users. It has been designed, right from the
> > start, to be extensible and configurable... Code::Blocks is built around
> > a plugin framework that allows it to be extended through the use of
> > external libraries (plugins). Actually, much of Code::Blocks
> > functionality already available, is provided by plugins. Code::Blocks
> > even includes a plugin creation wizard to help you create your own
> > plugins easily!

> Another C/C++ IDE? There is not much new in being able to support
> plugins. What is different with code::blocks?

The first thing that made me find Code::Blocks was my search for a light C/C++
IDE supporting code completion out of the box. KDevelop & Anjuta both do
that but not as good as Eclipse for example. Code::Blocks does it fine
already.