Comment 18 for bug 102025
Revision history for this message
| Serge van Ginderachter (svg) wrote Re: [Bug 102025] Re: [need-packaging] NoMachine NX server and client | #18 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
----- "Jo-Erlend Schinstad" <email address hidden> wrote:
> I think this bug should be closed. I really don't think the Ubuntu
> community or Canonical will ever support the NX technology, since
> they
> think it's flawed by design. But that's ok, because there is now a
> PPA
> for FreeNX Server.
Is there anything archived online on why they think so?
Also, if Nomachine's NS is supposedly flawed, I suppose the same remarks can be made on FreeNX?
So FreeNX would also never make it into Main?
> I personally think it's weird that everyone seems so unwilling to pay
> any attention to this, though I understand the unwillingness to put
> it
> in main. There are some concerns about NX' core libraries, but
> still...
> Nothing compares to the effeciency that NX provides, and truth be
> told,
> sometimes the possibility of doing something outweights the potential
> risk of doing so. Support the FreeNX team instead! It's located at
> https:/
I agree NX is a very functional piece of technology. I tend to allways compare it to the Windows Terminal Server / Citrix stack which is very popular in enterprise.
NX might help a lot to get the Linux Desktop pushed into enterprise, but that'll only work is a freely available version is available in the repositories.
Serge
Serge van Ginderachter http://
Kreeg u een "odt" bestand en kan u deze niet openen? Zie http://