Any reason that this bug isn't a duplicate of bug 305905? Vincenzo - I see that you've recently commented on bug 305905, what is the reason that you see this as a separate issue?
As to the question about why the page is not local - there is no compelling reason I can think of for the page to be local. It's opened in a web browser, is only useful if the user is connected to the internet (because it triggers a google search or other links) and is cached after first viewing.
Any reason that this bug isn't a duplicate of bug 305905? Vincenzo - I see that you've recently commented on bug 305905, what is the reason that you see this as a separate issue?
As to the question about why the page is not local - there is no compelling reason I can think of for the page to be local. It's opened in a web browser, is only useful if the user is connected to the internet (because it triggers a google search or other links) and is cached after first viewing.