Comment 17 for bug 392986

Revision history for this message
Paul Tagliamonte (paultag) wrote :

I'm tempted to mark this invalid, but I'm afraid people would whine about it. Here's why I will mark it invalid in a few days if no one gives a good defense --

The way I have Ohio running is as follows:

Ohio Team Contact
  |--> Administrative Board ( Governs Day-to-day )
            |----> City 1
            |----> City 2
            |----> City 3
            |----> City 4
             ...
            |----> City n

Each city has it's own "contact", and it's own events. It's all the same LoCo. LoCos should be a top-level group. This also allows us to approve a large area with shared membership, without having to deal with a city-by-city level.

The council really can't deal with approving every city. At that point, might as well handle all membership and get rid of a contact, right?