(In reply to Magnus Melin from comment #64)
> > - it doesn't have the alert dialog informing the user the folder was renamed.
> That doesn't sound to me like something we'd want.
It would be easier without it, but let's ask bwinton too.
> I'd too (like comment 8) prefer a folder-N, not folderN naming scheme.
The dash in comment 8 can be probably added trivially if we decide on it. The main point from comment 8 is that the original patch tried folder names like this: Folder0, Folder01, Folder012, etc... My patch tries Folder2, Folder3, Folder4, etc...
(In reply to Magnus Melin from comment #64)
> > - it doesn't have the alert dialog informing the user the folder was renamed.
> That doesn't sound to me like something we'd want.
It would be easier without it, but let's ask bwinton too.
> I'd too (like comment 8) prefer a folder-N, not folderN naming scheme.
The dash in comment 8 can be probably added trivially if we decide on it. The main point from comment 8 is that the original patch tried folder names like this: Folder0, Folder01, Folder012, etc... My patch tries Folder2, Folder3, Folder4, etc...