Comment 100 for bug 214366

(In reply to :aceman from comment #89)

> > We don't need to test all those combinations for every message store type,
> > but we should at least test the copyFolder(...aNewName) parameter works once
> > on each store type.
> Store type as in mbox and maildir? Do we actually have tests differentiating
> the stores?
> Can't bug 765926 cover maildir by itself?

As far as I know, maildir is mostly untested aside from what's discussed in bug 765926. I don't know whether the long term plan is to run the entire suite twice, once for mbox and once for maildir - if so then yes, we'd be covered. That's a huge waste of testing run time, but might be easier than refactoring our test suite into separate tests for the higher level and the store.