On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 02:24 +0000, Martin Pool wrote:
> So the
> question is whether there is another constraint that text attachments
> should be directly readable in the stream, or whether the raw stream
> is only for debugging.
I think its nifty to be able to read a raw stream via less but I don't
think its essential.
I'd rather have something you're happy with that you need an interpreter
to use (rather than debug visually) than the converse.
I will ask that we keep the parser for the current chunked attachments
around for a couple of releases, to ease transitions.
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 02:24 +0000, Martin Pool wrote:
> So the
> question is whether there is another constraint that text attachments
> should be directly readable in the stream, or whether the raw stream
> is only for debugging.
I think its nifty to be able to read a raw stream via less but I don't
think its essential.
I'd rather have something you're happy with that you need an interpreter
to use (rather than debug visually) than the converse.
I will ask that we keep the parser for the current chunked attachments
around for a couple of releases, to ease transitions.
-Rob