Reorganize person page

Bug #423705 reported by Jeroen T. Vermeulen
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Launchpad itself
Fix Released
High
Jeroen T. Vermeulen

Bug Description

The Person +translations page needs to change radically in migration to 3.0, even
before we fully implement the dashboard features.

Some changes that need making:

 * Replace the navigation menu with something other than the "related pages at
the bottom" that the 3.0 migration guidelines suggest.

 * Move the full translation history out into its own page.

 * Make the page look better.

Related branches

Changed in rosetta:
status: New → Triaged
tags: added: story-ui-3
Changed in rosetta:
status: Triaged → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Jeroen T. Vermeulen (jtv) wrote :

Fixed in devel 9411

Changed in rosetta:
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Adi Roiban (adiroiban) wrote :

Hi Jeroen and thank you for your work on the new personal page.

Here is my feedback.

Can you please add a section about translations that a user has to send upstream?

There is a strange behaviour. On my page, in the overview I can see EncFs as beeing listed, but when I choose to see all templates it is no longer there.
Also I don't know if „See all %d unreviews translations” really shows all the translations templates... at least on my account there are to few.

Can we also see only translation templates and not source packages ?

In the list I have „kdebase” telling me that I need to review 2 translations, but when I click the link I will get this link and I will have to find in all templates and in my specific language. Not very helpful at all.

https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/kdebase

Cheers

Revision history for this message
Jeroen T. Vermeulen (jtv) wrote :

Hi Adi,

Keeping track of what translations a user has to send upstream would involve a lot more changes. Launchpad would have to know or decide somehow whether a project represents upstream or whether upstream is interested, as well as who should send which translations—the translators, the reviewers, the maintainers in Launchpad, the translation group owners, the upstream authors, an upstream team for the project group, maintainers in Debian or some other place that's upstream from Ubuntu but downstream from the authors, someone in charge of translations that LP doesn't know about, or some dedicated team somewhere. Then, we'd have to figure out which translations have been sent up so that we can remove them from the list.

I think it's primarily up to the Ubuntu community to come up with a good protocol for this, and once we know there is an effective working arrangement, we could start building support for it. Arne has already put some thought into keeping track of the major package origins (GNU, Debian, Gnome, KDE etc.) and that could be a start, once implemented.

The reason for the strange behaviour you're seeing is that the lists on your home page are complemented with pseudo-random suggestions. Those are likely to be different every time you load the page, and we don't show them in the full listings.

Could you file a bug for breaking packages down into separate templates in the listings? We had to aggregate the listings to keep them short, but it's not always going to present the best possible summary of any given situation. We have a separate module to do this aggregation, and we could make it smarter e.g. by listing separate POFiles instead of aggregating if there are only 2 or 3 POFiles in a given context.

Jeroen

Revision history for this message
Данило Шеган (danilo) wrote : Re: [Bug 423705] Re: Reorganize person page

У пон, 21. 09 2009. у 08:56 +0000, Jeroen T. Vermeulen пише:

> Could you file a bug for breaking packages down into separate
> templates in the listings? We had to aggregate the listings to keep
> them short, but it's not always going to present the best possible
> summary of any given situation. We have a separate module to do this
> aggregation, and we could make it smarter e.g. by listing separate
> POFiles instead of aggregating if there are only 2 or 3 POFiles in a
> given context.

The way I'd prefer us to fix this is to have links take you only to a
page listing only those pofiles needing review. I.e. if it's for a
product, it should take you to something like
https://translations.launchpad.net/product/trunk/+lang/ro/?show=needsreview

This is something I expect us to work on in the short term.

Changed in rosetta:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.