Would something like this work? (For the lenny version of the package though, and we’re only about to test it.)
In the long term, I’d prefer upstream to simply rename the field and not add another hidden one though.
Would something like this work? (For the lenny version of the package though, and we’re
only about to test it.)
In the long term, I’d prefer upstream to simply rename the field and not add another
hidden one though.