Comment 7 for bug 429411
Revision history for this message
| Scott James Remnant (Canonical) (canonical-scott) wrote | #7 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
Making this a weak symbol seems to have the right effect; when it's missing from glibc, it has no address, which the code now checks for and doesn't stash it (runtime check > configure check)