On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Christian Reis <email address hidden> wrote:
> I wonder if there's a different algorithm we can use? I suspect that
> even without the portlet taking up space that diagram will be pretty
> squeezy..
>
Not if you do it vertically.
>
> --
> Dependency chart becomes unreadable with >12 dependencies
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66344
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in The Launchpad Blueprint Tracker: Triaged
>
> Bug description:
> The dependency chart is unreadable for any specification that has more than
> about a dozen dependencies. For example, <
> https://features.launchpad.net/products/launchpad-foundations/+spec/1.0-web-interface
> >.
>
> This could be fixed by making the dependency levels run vertically, rather
> than horizontally. This would work better because specification names are
> shorter than they are wide, so they could be packed more closely together.
>
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Christian Reis <email address hidden> wrote:
> I wonder if there's a different algorithm we can use? I suspect that
> even without the portlet taking up space that diagram will be pretty
> squeezy..
>
Not if you do it vertically.
> /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 66344 /features. launchpad. net/products/ launchpad- foundations/ +spec/1. 0-web-interface
> --
> Dependency chart becomes unreadable with >12 dependencies
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in The Launchpad Blueprint Tracker: Triaged
>
> Bug description:
> The dependency chart is unreadable for any specification that has more than
> about a dozen dependencies. For example, <
> https:/
> >.
>
> This could be fixed by making the dependency levels run vertically, rather
> than horizontally. This would work better because specification names are
> shorter than they are wide, so they could be packed more closely together.
>
-- datacharmer. org/
The Data Charmer
http://