On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Gary Poster <email address hidden> wrote:
> I thought I was done and was preparing an MP, but no: we do not generate
> the WADL on the central box before we push out. This means that the
> ETag scheme I had planned won't work. The obvious fix is to check in
> the WADL, which will be a win for building new branches, and we are
> already generating wadl in test runs so we can use that sunk cost to
> also check that the WADL that is checked in is the same as what would be
> generated.
The wadl is pretty big; I'd -really- rather not check it in.
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Gary Poster <email address hidden> wrote:
> I thought I was done and was preparing an MP, but no: we do not generate
> the WADL on the central box before we push out. This means that the
> ETag scheme I had planned won't work. The obvious fix is to check in
> the WADL, which will be a win for building new branches, and we are
> already generating wadl in test runs so we can use that sunk cost to
> also check that the WADL that is checked in is the same as what would be
> generated.
The wadl is pretty big; I'd -really- rather not check it in.
Generating the wadl on our central box is easy.