WADL is served from memory, and should be super-duper fast. The SQL is just authorization, I believe.
If I had to guess, I'd say that this is a really slow client--but Apache should be slurping this up from Zope quickly and serving it at whatever speed the client wants. So I don't know.
I feel like the wadl ought to be served from Apache, but maybe there's a good reason not to. If we were to do that, though, this OOPS would go away.
WADL is served from memory, and should be super-duper fast. The SQL is just authorization, I believe.
If I had to guess, I'd say that this is a really slow client--but Apache should be slurping this up from Zope quickly and serving it at whatever speed the client wants. So I don't know.
I feel like the wadl ought to be served from Apache, but maybe there's a good reason not to. If we were to do that, though, this OOPS would go away.