On 19 July 2010 14:54, Jeroen T. Vermeulen <email address hidden> wrote:
> On further inspection I'm pretty certain this is not the cause of the
> timeouts, but it's definitely a bad thing. All the more so if we're
> often fetching it unnecessarily. I'm working up a fix—the main question
> is why initial_message sorts by id instead of by creation date and id.
> May be a performance issue.
I've already got a fix ready to land (see linked, then unlinked, then
re-linked branch). Is there a particular reason to sort by creation
date and id?
On 19 July 2010 14:54, Jeroen T. Vermeulen <email address hidden> wrote:
> On further inspection I'm pretty certain this is not the cause of the
> timeouts, but it's definitely a bad thing. All the more so if we're
> often fetching it unnecessarily. I'm working up a fix—the main question
> is why initial_message sorts by id instead of by creation date and id.
> May be a performance issue.
I've already got a fix ready to land (see linked, then unlinked, then
re-linked branch). Is there a particular reason to sort by creation
date and id?