On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 03:11:55AM -0000, Stuart Bishop wrote: > I suspect we need to special case this somehow
I didn't quite catch why we would need to special-case this.
Is the problem just the fact that the sync is currently broken, and that if we assume it always works (once we fix it and add tests) we would be okay?
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 03:11:55AM -0000, Stuart Bishop wrote:
> I suspect we need to special case this somehow
I didn't quite catch why we would need to special-case this.
Is the problem just the fact that the sync is currently broken, and that
if we assume it always works (once we fix it and add tests) we would be
okay?