On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Julian Edwards
<email address hidden> wrote:
> Sourcepackagename is for database normalisation. I don't think you want
> the same string repeated on hundreds of package version records. ;)
>
> I talked to Michael N and we agree that we can just traverse through a
> string package name for recipes, they won't be as prevalent as
> sourcepackagerelease.
Julian, I think MichaelH's point is that he doesn't see a reason why
it's bad to create the record when the SPRecipe is created.
Also, I don't think it's worth considering any updates to the SPRecipe
code until we finalise the UI and see exactly what we need for users
to be able to use it - sorry for the noise.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Julian Edwards lease.
<email address hidden> wrote:
> Sourcepackagename is for database normalisation. I don't think you want
> the same string repeated on hundreds of package version records. ;)
>
> I talked to Michael N and we agree that we can just traverse through a
> string package name for recipes, they won't be as prevalent as
> sourcepackagere
Julian, I think MichaelH's point is that he doesn't see a reason why
it's bad to create the record when the SPRecipe is created.
Also, I don't think it's worth considering any updates to the SPRecipe
code until we finalise the UI and see exactly what we need for users
to be able to use it - sorry for the noise.