On Friday 11 December 2009 09:13:43 Abel Deuring wrote:
> Right, that's the same error. But I'd like to know _why_ lfa.content is
> None. If this is to be expected, i.e., if the affected records had
> lfa.content.deleted == True before the schema change, then the affected
> code must be fixed; otherwise, I'd like to know at first, what else
> caused lfa.content to become None.
>
It would have been when we obsoleted old distroseries and then ran the
librarian GC to force a librarian cleanup.
On Friday 11 December 2009 09:13:43 Abel Deuring wrote:
> Right, that's the same error. But I'd like to know _why_ lfa.content is
> None. If this is to be expected, i.e., if the affected records had
> lfa.content.deleted == True before the schema change, then the affected
> code must be fixed; otherwise, I'd like to know at first, what else
> caused lfa.content to become None.
>
It would have been when we obsoleted old distroseries and then ran the
librarian GC to force a librarian cleanup.