This was discussed in yesterday's desktop team meeting, and I got similar feedback:
- Many bug reports do not actually need further information, such as translation errors (brought up by Arne) or UI usability problems, or wishlist bugs.
- Some people are afraid of accidentally sending private information.
- ubuntu-bug does not work for some people, e. g. behind company firewalls.
The preference was to change the +filebug page in a way that it shows the wiki page content, but also offers a link at the bottom to "file the bug anyway". Since that's a bit trick to do, it was also proposed as a compromise to disable the redirection for ubuntu-bugcontrol members.
This was discussed in yesterday's desktop team meeting, and I got similar feedback:
- Many bug reports do not actually need further information, such as translation errors (brought up by Arne) or UI usability problems, or wishlist bugs.
- Some people are afraid of accidentally sending private information.
- ubuntu-bug does not work for some people, e. g. behind company firewalls.
The preference was to change the +filebug page in a way that it shows the wiki page content, but also offers a link at the bottom to "file the bug anyway". Since that's a bit trick to do, it was also proposed as a compromise to disable the redirection for ubuntu-bugcontrol members.