Is this in addition to, or a replacement for branchrevision?
stub seems to be saying that branchrevision is ok, if we fix some data and prevent bad data in future.
Having multiple different caches will impose more of a processing (and even design) cost.
Is this in addition to, or a replacement for branchrevision?
stub seems to be saying that branchrevision is ok, if we fix some data and prevent bad data in future.
Having multiple different caches will impose more of a processing (and even design) cost.