The problem is the fact that 'openoffice.org' and openoffice.org-l10n' have orig.tar.ǵz with same contents (same MD5) but with different names.
`death-row` performs an optimization when checking files for removal and picks only the first occurrence of a given MD5 (content) in pool.
So, depending on the order the tarballs where uploaded/published, only the oldest one was actually removed from disk.
We should fix the `death-row`, either removing the optimization or improving it to cope with this legitimate (from the packaging PoV) situation.
The problem is the fact that 'openoffice.org' and openoffice. org-l10n' have orig.tar.ǵz with same contents (same MD5) but with different names.
`death-row` performs an optimization when checking files for removal and picks only the first occurrence of a given MD5 (content) in pool.
So, depending on the order the tarballs where uploaded/published, only the oldest one was actually removed from disk.
We should fix the `death-row`, either removing the optimization or improving it to cope with this legitimate (from the packaging PoV) situation.