> Keeping a set of old versions is not a bad idea, having said that. I was
> thinking that one way of solving this would be increasing the stay of
> execution time to something longer. For how long would you want
> this version to hang around, Martin?
>
> Another option would be to change the policy for removing superseded
> packages; for instance, always keeping one superseded version of the
> package around.
Either of those could be good. It sounds like you also want a flag
saying that a particular team is allowed to retain versions
indefinitely, or for a longer period, or more different versions.
2009/2/5 Christian Reis <email address hidden>:
> Keeping a set of old versions is not a bad idea, having said that. I was
> thinking that one way of solving this would be increasing the stay of
> execution time to something longer. For how long would you want
> this version to hang around, Martin?
>
> Another option would be to change the policy for removing superseded
> packages; for instance, always keeping one superseded version of the
> package around.
Either of those could be good. It sounds like you also want a flag
saying that a particular team is allowed to retain versions
indefinitely, or for a longer period, or more different versions.
-- launchpad. net/~mbp/>
Martin <http://