Comment 4 for bug 316253
Revision history for this message
| Tim Penhey (thumper) wrote Re: [Bug 316253] Re: No status for "basically ok, some questions" | #4 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
a60fb26
(Get the code!)
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:10:21 Jonathan Lange wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Aaron Bentley <email address hidden> wrote:
> > To me, this is a classic example of a comment. You're not ready to
> > review until you've got the answers.
>
> Interesting.
>
> A comment doesn't address the workflow situation: I want to indicate
> that I'm blocked until I get answers, and that the patch submitter
> needs to do something.
Well if you're blocked is that "needs fixing"?
Or perhaps you're after a "needs feedback", or "needs response"?
Tim